DivotMaker
New member
snakyjake said:@JackT
Thanks for the input. I'm trying to justify the #3. I don't cook for large parties (16 lbs of pork butt would be enough for any party I have) , and don't want to spend extra money to look "professional". So there needs to be a need.
My cooks will be:
(A) 2x8lb pork butt + 1 pan beans/m&c
or
(B) Jerky (which you can get an accessory for extra racks)
It seems the #2 would be the right fit. Unless...
Water pan is recommended to the above for better meat moisture, and can be added to the #3 while the #2 won't have the room. Or the pan of beans/m&c could serve as the "water" pan, and the #2 would be good to go.
Jerky gets too crowded on the #2, or the batch is too small. But the extra rack accessory for the #2 might make the crowding a non-issue.
Not cutting the brisket retains moisture for a noticeably better product.
Not sure why cutting a rack of ribs is a big deal. I have to cut the ribs to portion/servings anyways.
Jake,
Don't get hung up on meat by weight, look at it by volume. Yes, you can do 2 butts in the #2, but it's quite cramped, due to the volume of meat. No problem in the 3. Great point about the full briskets...again, no problem in the 3. No, cutting racks of ribs in half is not a big deal...I've done many with no problem.
Water pan? Yes, there's room in any of the smokers; it goes on the floor, next to the smoke box, not on a rack.
The main reason for the 3 is expandability! I like to think of it like a stereo; if you listen to it at medium-volume most of the time, a smaller head unit and speakers are fine. But, for those times when you really want to kick it up, there is no substitute for power and "head room!" If you don't have it, you can't use it! The 3 is like that....great to have the room, when you need it. Plus, as your smoking ability evolves, you want to have the space to accommodate your needs. Like Dave said...let your budget decide, but I recommend the 3, if you can swing it.